When Author Submits a Manuscript to our journal, will go through the double-blind peer review process as follows:

The Very Important to note that for Review and Editing of The manuscripts are primarily Depend on the Quality of the paper upon first submission. With the exception of papers submitted under the Fast-Track Process, in which we guarantee an editorial decision within 15 business days (2 weeks excluding weekends and public holidays) and publication of the article within 3 days after acceptance,

Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief 

When assigned a new submission, the Editor in chief  will decide if it suitable for  peer review or not, if not it will be rejected without review. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious conceptual and/or methodological flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal.

Invitation to Reviewers

The Editor in chief sends invitations to two reviewers. The reviewers are selected based on their expertise in accordance with the topic of the manuscript.

Response to Invitations

Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.

Review is Conducted

Two reviewers of the same expertise conduct their review on the manuscript.

Journal Evaluates the Reviews

Once the reviewers complete their review and send the results to the chief editor, the chief editor evaluates the results of the review.

Reviewer reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate and select one option:

• Accept Submission.
• Revision Required.
• Resubmit for Review.
• Resubmit Elsewhere.
• Decline Submission.
• See Comments.

Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

The Decision is Communicated

The chief editor sends a decision email to the author notifying about the decision for their manuscript, including any relevant comments from the reviewers for revisions. The comments are anonymous

Author's Revision

If The Manuscript accepted, the manuscript is sent to copyeditor. If The manuscript is Rejected, it will be archived. If the manuscript is sent back for either major or minor revision, the chief editor will include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve his/her manuscript.

The reviewers also receive an email letting them know the outcome of their review on the manuscript. If the paper is sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version, unless they have opted out of further participation.

When only minor changes are requested from the author, this follow-up review is taken care of by the chief editor.